<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going Full Mac (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dienkwik.com/blog/2008/12/01/going-full-mac-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dienkwik.com/blog/2008/12/01/going-full-mac-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rivai</title>
		<link>http://dienkwik.com/blog/2008/12/01/going-full-mac-part-2/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dienkwik.com/blog/?p=166#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Hi Dien Hong, looks like the next version of Mac OSX Snow Leopard will be able to solve your MS Exchange problem. Check out this site:

http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dien Hong, looks like the next version of Mac OSX Snow Leopard will be able to solve your MS Exchange problem. Check out this site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/">http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dienkwik</title>
		<link>http://dienkwik.com/blog/2008/12/01/going-full-mac-part-2/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>dienkwik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dienkwik.com/blog/?p=166#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Yup, kinda thought so...  well in the mean time then Entourage is half useless for me.  
I&#039;ve installed parallels and added a Windows XP virtual machine.  It looks like the pain is much less if I just maintain an outlook application on this virtual machine, rather than force mac to synch with exchange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, kinda thought so&#8230;  well in the mean time then Entourage is half useless for me.<br />
I&#8217;ve installed parallels and added a Windows XP virtual machine.  It looks like the pain is much less if I just maintain an outlook application on this virtual machine, rather than force mac to synch with exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonardi</title>
		<link>http://dienkwik.com/blog/2008/12/01/going-full-mac-part-2/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>leonardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dienkwik.com/blog/?p=166#comment-58</guid>
		<description>pitty Entourage  task &amp; categories sync feature won&#039;t be available in the near future
the Lead Program Manager for Entourage Andy Ruff said:

Half a decade ago, Entourage did not even talk to Exchange.  We have been
consistently and regularly adding Exchange functionality to Entourage, many
of them in regular, free updates.  2008 brought a number of new features:

* Out of Office
* Kerberos Single Sign-on
* Free/Busy Detailing
* To Do flag sync
* Delegation over HTTP

We realize there are shortcomings and some of them are painful.  However, we
want to make sure we build a reliable product.  Not just check features.  We
stepped back from features and took the time to improve the app¹s quality
and reliability.  Without doing so, it would have been much harder to
deliver more Exchange functionality in the future as we plan to do.  You
will find Entourage 2008 much more reliable when using existing Exchange
functionality such as calendaring and mailbox synchronization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pitty Entourage  task &amp; categories sync feature won&#8217;t be available in the near future<br />
the Lead Program Manager for Entourage Andy Ruff said:</p>
<p>Half a decade ago, Entourage did not even talk to Exchange.  We have been<br />
consistently and regularly adding Exchange functionality to Entourage, many<br />
of them in regular, free updates.  2008 brought a number of new features:</p>
<p>* Out of Office<br />
* Kerberos Single Sign-on<br />
* Free/Busy Detailing<br />
* To Do flag sync<br />
* Delegation over HTTP</p>
<p>We realize there are shortcomings and some of them are painful.  However, we<br />
want to make sure we build a reliable product.  Not just check features.  We<br />
stepped back from features and took the time to improve the app¹s quality<br />
and reliability.  Without doing so, it would have been much harder to<br />
deliver more Exchange functionality in the future as we plan to do.  You<br />
will find Entourage 2008 much more reliable when using existing Exchange<br />
functionality such as calendaring and mailbox synchronization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
